As usual - when I started work on this project I had no idea what I was doing. As I continued to work on the prospectus for the book = I kept trying on and digging into different ideas for how to pull our various projects together.
In some ways I haven't 'thrown away' the idea we started out with - which was to take a look at the discourses/identities/writing practices in a set of communities associated with mediated writing, and see how they might look when placed next to the D/I/WPs often associated with academic contexts => and then think about:
- what D/I/WPs might be evoked in what kinds of classroom contexts
- what writing/feelings/classroom participation might look like when cast through those D/I/WPs
- how/whether teachers can benefit from a heads up in terms of what kinds of D/I/WPs come into their classrooms from different writing communities
- and so on
So here is the first, messy, not finished draft for the chapters of the book.
Title: First-person
ethnography, small research, and the study of discourses surrounding the screen
Introduction:
Discuss the book’s
focus, audience, & purpose, + how to read it & provide an overview of the chapters
1.
Being
there in a digital age
·
The idea
of perspective in ethnography => watching +writing as central to ethnography
(Clifford & Marcus)
·
idea
of studying “cutures” (conceiving the object of study as separate from the culture
that examines them= move to connective ethnograhy)
·
changing
conceptions of writing accompanying mediated world
·
new
methods for collecting, analyzing and representing data
·
move
toward collaborative composing/multiple perspectives=invisible collaborators
behind the page=> whose perspective? (can be a move back toward the
god-trick)
·
Ethnography,
ethics + intentional, transparent choices about representation (as re-defined
by mediated composing practices + representations)
2.
First-person
ethnography, small research, and the value of local perspectives (methods)
·
Collaborative
nature of mediated projects
·
concepts
of auto-ethnographies, seen through the eyes of a single researcher v
collaborative projects
·
Value of seeing a community through the eyes
of a single observer (triangualtion=> observers life/perspective is part of
what makes the data readable)- use example =Dibbell’s work(representing a
community); Gee’s book on video games
(representing his own work;
·
discussion
of a sampling methods (local participants=local community; local participants=dispersed
communities; dispersed participants=local community; dispersed participants/researchers=dispersed
communities
·
models
for using clusters of ethnographies to examine ideas (as in Selfe, Hawisher
+Berry)=> (compare difference in presentation between Transnational lives ,
Bober & Livinstone, and Geeking out) + discuss the differences
·
translation
of small research to mediated presentations
3.
Using local clusters of first-person
ethnographies to examine ideas: an example
·
Our questions
about discursuve flow-back in mediated participation
·
How we
worked together
II. Discourses surrounding the screen
4.
Fantasy
Sports local-local
5.
Writing
group for e-lit local-local
6.
GPOY
local-dispersed
7.
I F
love science local-dispersed
8.
Fandom
Wing dispersed-dispersed (transformed to
local)
9.
Fanfiction=dispersed-dispersed
10.
NaNoWriMo dispersed=dispersed
11.
Putting
the personal on the page: Classroom blogs in a creative writing class local (? Coming
into being)-local(not sure – because classmates + teacher are felt as
dispersed/other)
III. I haven't thought of a title yet
No comments:
Post a Comment